لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a very well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
limitation of liability to the extent of a cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)
Statutory laws are Those people created by legislative bodies, for example Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this sort of regulation strives to condition our society, offering rules and guidelines, it would be impossible for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In this weblog post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions plus the gravity of its punishment.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're on the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion can be viewed as, however, we are crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy issue to your approval with the competent authority. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the legislation. This example of case legislation refers to two cases read during the state court, with the same level.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe for a foster child. Even though the pair experienced two youthful children of their have at home, the social worker didn't tell them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement from the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced younger children.
two. I have listened to the figured out counsel to the parties along with discovered DPG at length, perused the record and noticed that:-
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only completed In case the employee can show that that they had a good click here reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence along with the separation of powers.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.